Evidence Based Practice in Dentistry

This paper provides a review of the available evidence for traditional prosthodontic need determination and management strategies for older, partially dentate individuals, and compares it to the documented functional benefits of a more limited yet targeted approach to alleviating morphological shortfalls for this group of people, at the population level. The reasons for which the traditional total replacement strategy is not universally applicable or viable are discussed, and research is presented which tests many of the assertions made for the mandatory replacement of posterior teeth. Evidence is presented of the growing prosthodontic challenge posed by an increasing number of middle-aged and older partially dentate individuals in society: many of their remaining teeth are in poor condition, yet few such patients are willing to accept the prospect of becoming edentulous. The shortened dental arch concept is discussed and proposed as an appropriate strategy when complex intervention is to be avoided, inadvisable, or not possible. At the population level, current evidence suggests that prosthodontic strategies aimed at the restoration and/or replacement of all lost molars may be inappropriate in older, partially dentate individuals. A more limited yet targeted strategy is both more effective and more efficient, and should not be seen as compromised care. Copyright © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel